Skip to content

CVE-2023-4547

Cross-site Scripting: Is CVE-2023-4547 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.

Community verdict: No field verdicts yet. Be the first practitioner to weigh in.

signals

public sources

Exploited in wild
Not listed
CISA KEV
Public exploit
Exploit-DB
Metasploit/EDB/PoC
Base severity
3.5 Low
CVSS
Exploitation prob.
64%
FIRST EPSS
Weakness
CWE-79 · Cross-site Scripting
CWE

Lower base score, but a notable exploitation probability. Don't dismiss it on score alone.

public exploits

links to sources — we don’t host code

A working exploit is publicly available from a maintained source. Treat this as higher urgency and verify your exposure.

baseline read

auto · not a community verdict

Low signal — verdict needed

Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.

Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS

Confirm or dispute →
Affected:Spa Cart

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

A flaw has been found in SPA-Cart eCommerce CMS 1.9.0.3. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /search. This manipulation of the argument filter[brandid]/filter[price] causes cross site scripting. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. Upgrading to version 1.9.1.4 is sufficient to fix this issue. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.

Published

Embed this verdict
TruePositive verdict for CVE-2023-4547
Markdown
[![TruePositive verdict](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2023-4547/badge.svg)](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2023-4547)
HTML
<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2023-4547"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2023-4547/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2023-4547"></a>

Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.

timeline

  1. Published by NVD

Score and exploit changes tracked since .

Community ground truth

Be the first practitioner to weigh in

So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.

🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.

In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?

awaiting field verdicts
Real, but not a risk here
Not a real issue

Curated baseline: TruePositive's read from public sources is Real & exploitable — a starting point, not a community verdict.

No account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.

Field notes & remediation

Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.

  • 0
    Field note · TruePositive EditorialCurated

    A working public exploit is published for this, so the barrier to attack is low. FIRST EPSS estimates about a 64% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, which is high relative to most CVEs. Patch this on priority and confirm the fix holds.

Add a field note or remediationoptional
Note type

What are you adding?

Markdown supported · minimum 20 characters.

Same weakness: CWE-79 · Cross-site Scripting.