CVE-2026-56296
Is CVE-2026-56296 real, exploitable, or a false positive? Here's the community verdict.
signals
public sources
Moderate signals. Triage by your actual exposure and reachability.
baseline read
auto · not a community verdict
Low signal — verdict needed
Few public signals point to active risk. Whether a scanner hit here is a true or false positive depends on your version and config — community verdicts decide.
Based on CVSS · FIRST EPSS
Confirm or dispute →CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Cap-go before 12.128.2 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the public.transfer_app RPC function that returns distinct error messages for existing versus non-existing app IDs. Unauthenticated attackers can enumerate valid app IDs by observing error message differences when calling transfer_app with only the publishable API key.
References
Published
Embed this verdict
[](https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-56296)<a href="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-56296"><img src="https://www.truepositive.app/cve/CVE-2026-56296/badge.svg" alt="TruePositive verdict for CVE-2026-56296"></a>Live badge that updates automatically as the community verdict changes.
Community ground truth
Be the first practitioner to weigh in
So far this is only TruePositive's editorial baseline from public sources. Add your real-world verdict below — it becomes the signal the next person triaging this relies on.
🥇 The first 50 practitioners to contribute earn a Founding Contributor badge.
In your experience, is this finding real and exploitable?
awaiting field verdictsNo account needed. Anonymous verdicts post as an unverified signal. Log in to make yours verified and earn reputation.
Field notes & remediation
Verdicts are the quick signal. Notes are the evidence and fixes behind them.
No notes yet. Be the first to share what you saw, or a fix that worked.
Add a field note or remediationoptional
Related CVEs
Same weakness: CWE-203.
- CVE-2026-64822MED 5.3
djangoSIGE through 1.10 (commit a6fe7e8) contains a user enumeration vulnerability in ForgotPasswordView within djangosige/apps/login/views.py that allows unauthenticated attackers to identify valid accounts by observing distinct error messages returned by the password reset endpoint. Attackers can submit arbitrary usernames or email addresses to the POST login/esqueceu/ endpoint and distinguish between existing and non-existing accounts based on observable discrepancies in the application's responses.
- CVE-2026-45294MED 5.3
FreeScout is a free help desk and shared inbox built with PHP's Laravel framework. Prior to 1.8.219, the password reset endpoint returns visually distinct responses depending on whether the submitted email address belongs to an existing user account, allowing unauthenticated attackers to enumerate valid helpdesk agent email addresses. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.219.
- CVE-2026-65314MED 4.3
Electric Postgres Sync versions below 1.6.10 contains an information disclosure vulnerability that allows attackers to infer the values of excluded columns by crafting subset where clause conditions against shape responses. Attackers can observe whether subset where conditions match rows to deduce sensitive field data even though those columns are not returned in shape responses, bypassing column-based access restrictions.
- CVE-2026-45410MED 5.3EPSS 0%
TREK is a collaborative travel planner. Prior to 3.0.18, early return on missing user during login flow allowed an attacker to enumerate valid user accounts via response timing discrepancy. When an email address existed in the database, the backend performed a bcrypt password comparison before returning a 401 Unauthorized, adding ~370 ms of latency. When the email did not exist, the backend returned immediately (~10 ms). This ~14× timing difference could be detected without any difference in HTTP status codes or response bodies. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.0.18.